Page 1 of 1

Old Florida Road

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:42 pm
by PatriotJeep
Old Florida road what to do?

1We should keep off the ATV trail it is on state land
2We should keep out of the far right of the water hole. Post signs.
3We should use the bypass on dry land to the left keep out of the waterhole. We need to ask ourselfs want is more important keeping out of the water or maybe driving on the edge of waht could be the road?
I don't think WE should spend a dime on a survey We could be wrong and open a can of worms in court.

***Option three added by Scott Hatch

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:48 pm
by PatriotJeep
Scott posted some signs at the other end. We talked about it at the last meeting about posting signs at the water hole end.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:17 pm
by adk_tj
A poll is useless unless everyone agrees to follow what the majority would like to see happen. We saw how that went... :roll:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 5:24 pm
by Scott Hatch
:lol: :up:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:47 pm
by kodi
:roll:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:50 pm
by markdupont
please delete this poll.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:51 pm
by Zaedock
1We should keep off the ATV trail it is on state land
2We should keep out of the far right of the water hole. Post signs.
3We should use the bypass on dry land to the left keep out of the waterhole. We need to ask ourselfs want is more important keeping out of the water or maybe driving on the edge of waht could be the road?
4please delete this poll.

I'll take option 4.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:25 pm
by Scott Hatch
I'm going to do some more site analysis ASAP here on the road width from the stone wall just south of the mudhole and see where the measurement puts us.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:38 pm
by PatriotJeep
A poll is a poll. The NEA said turn around we are working on a new statement. EC has driven the road end to end so have the locals.
This gives a lot of people a chance to vote on this issue lets see what we come up with.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:00 pm
by rawlus
personally, i don't have an issue with running the trail in and out, never entering the wet zone.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:04 pm
by Scott Hatch
rawlus wrote:personally, i don't have an issue with running the trail in and out, never entering the wet zone.


Third option added :up:

PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:19 pm
by Paul
2We should keep out of the far right of the water hole


:shock:
In that case, I recommend low 2 and 6,000rpm, but, you still won't make it.

:paul:

PostPosted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 12:22 am
by Wagz
Banfield just never will *get it*...

It's no secret I agree wholeheartedly with Rawlus on this one.

Actually, I also agree with the freaky old guy, too.

HI MARK.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:09 pm
by PatriotJeep
Oh I get It it's a town road and unless it is gated, posted or blocked then it is open. It has been 3 years and the town and state still have no plans
to close it.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:37 pm
by Scott Hatch
:bang: IF I have said it once to you, I've said it a thousand times. The status of the road is NOT in question, our concern is in regards to the environmental impact :bang:

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:21 am
by wally
c'mon, scott. it's all about me. not about the association, or working with diverse interests to find acceptable practices. i'm in it for my own interests, and to hell with the consequences. :twisted: :roll:

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:19 pm
by Paul
I always suspected that of you Wally. :poke: