tammylynn wrote:Is the info learned in this class applicable to any state?
mrfreakinwhite wrote:If Kiosks are the chosen project, try to do as many as possible at once, right? I believe we are limited to 2 grants per year.
mrfreakinwhite wrote:Scott/Tammy, let me know if I can help.
mrfreakinwhite wrote:There are BIG differences between each of the states in what they will award (total) and compared to CT (2 yrs ago) NH is getting the short end of the stick and probably is better at utilizing the grants for their intended uses. CT was begging for more motorized applicants so they could get more cash for non-motorized trails.
mrfreakinwhite wrote:Scott, I wish we had more time to chat and I think you and I should make it a point to just get together and hang out soon. Do some unibody twisting somewhere.
Scott Hatch wrote:In the great state of New Hampshire we have the "Grant in Aid" program. This program takes portions of the registration fees, places them in a fund, and then OHRV Clubs or towns looking to create/improve OHRV trails can submit grant requests. This program is exclusive to the motorized users. The Grant in Aid funds and materials can be used as the 20% match on the RTP grants. Grant in Aid funds cover 100% of material costs...
Its sad that the communistwealth hates motorized recreation....Grant in Aid allows for some kick-a$$ trail projects
mrfreakinwhite wrote:Scott Hatch wrote:In the great state of New Hampshire we have the "Grant in Aid" program. This program takes portions of the registration fees, places them in a fund, and then OHRV Clubs or towns looking to create/improve OHRV trails can submit grant requests. This program is exclusive to the motorized users. The Grant in Aid funds and materials can be used as the 20% match on the RTP grants. Grant in Aid funds cover 100% of material costs...
Its sad that the communistwealth hates motorized recreation....Grant in Aid allows for some kick-a$$ trail projects
Hear ye, hear ye.
Forget roads vs trails (not that i really disagreed), this is where the money is at.
What happens in CT is fawked up! NO MOTORIZED TRAILS and they are scooping up a HUGE allowance of RTP grant money.
Scott Hatch wrote:mrfreakinwhite wrote:Scott Hatch wrote:In the great state of New Hampshire we have the "Grant in Aid" program. This program takes portions of the registration fees, places them in a fund, and then OHRV Clubs or towns looking to create/improve OHRV trails can submit grant requests. This program is exclusive to the motorized users. The Grant in Aid funds and materials can be used as the 20% match on the RTP grants. Grant in Aid funds cover 100% of material costs...
Its sad that the communistwealth hates motorized recreation....Grant in Aid allows for some kick-a$$ trail projects
Hear ye, hear ye.
Forget roads vs trails (not that i really disagreed), this is where the money is at.
What happens in CT is fawked up! NO MOTORIZED TRAILS and they are scooping up a HUGE allowance of RTP grant money.
Someone needs to call the FHWA and b!tch - they are receiving Federal Gas Taxes when the state has no motorized trails.....as such if the 30% doesn't get called for this is then free-for-all money
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest